Peran Work-Life Balance dan Career Growth Opportunity dalam Meningkatkan Employee Engagement pada Generasi Z
Main Article Content
Abstract
Employee engagement has become one of the strategic issues in human resource management because it is closely related to organizational productivity, commitment, innovation, and sustainability. Generation Z employees possess distinct work characteristics and expectations, particularly regarding work-life balance and career development opportunities. This study aims to analyze the influence of Work-Life Balance and Career Growth Opportunity on Employee Engagement among Generation Z employees. The research employed a quantitative approach using the Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) method. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 100 Generation Z employees in Makassar City. The findings indicate that Work-Life Balance has a positive and significant effect on Employee Engagement (β = 0.314; t = 3.988; p < 0.001). Likewise, Career Growth Opportunity positively and significantly influences Employee Engagement (β = 0.290; t = 3.349; p = 0.001). Although both variables significantly contribute to employee engagement, the coefficient of determination (R² = 0.178) indicates that additional factors beyond the proposed model also influence employee engagement. These findings highlight the importance of organizational policies that support work-life balance and career development to enhance Generation Z employees' engagement.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adamek, A., Brkić, A., & Živković, A. (2025). Generation Z and the Future of Work: Expectations of a Healthy Workplace. Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on Management and Economics, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33422/conferenceme.v3i1.1297
Anabelle, M. (2025). Gen Z at Work: The Impact of Culture, Career Growth, and Employee Well-Being on Employee Engagement. Journal of Communication and Business. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/jki.2025.04.4.20.
Anandita, S., Gunawan, A., & Febriyansyah, H. (2025). Exploring gen z engagement: Work–life balance and flexibility in creative programming work. Journal of Educational Management Research, 4(4), 1560-1569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v4i4.1128
Aruldoss, A., Berube Kowalski, K., Travis, M. L., & Parayitam, S. (2022). The relationship between work–life balance and job satisfaction: Moderating role of training and development and work environment. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 19(2), 240-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-01-2021-0002
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 10(1), 25-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
Gallup. (2024). State of the Global Workplace: 2024 report. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/state-of-the-global-workplace
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07413-4.
Safirah, N. A., & Widigdo, A. M. N. (2025). Effect of Green Work-Life Balance and Career Development on Turnover Intention with Employee Engagement as a Mediating Variable. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 10(4), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2025.10.4.2779
Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human resource management review, 32(3), 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835
Septiani, D., Jalil, A., Septia, F., & Putri, A. D. (2024, December). Perceptions of Generation Z About Work Life Balance, Managerial Support and Workplace's Stress Level: A Literature Review. In International Conference on Research and Development (ICORAD) (Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 208-217). https://doi.org/10.47841/icorad.v3i2.252