Environmental Fiqh Beyond Moral Authority: Translational Enforceability in Climate Governance
Keywords:
Climate governance; Environmental fiqh; Fatwa; Maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah; Translational enforceability.Abstract
Climate change has increasingly been governed through carbon measurement, emission targets, and administrative control. This article examines a less explored question, namely how environmental fiqh can acquire policy force within a national legal system that does not formally recognize fatwa as legislation. Focusing on Fatwa MUI No. 86 of 2023 on the law of controlling global climate change, the study uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and maqāṣid-based analysis. The article argues that the fatwa gives climate change a juridical form by linking ecological harm to mafsadah, mitigation to responsibility, and climate restraint to the protection of public welfare. Yet this religious-normative force does not create direct legal enforceability under Indonesian national law. A fatwa cannot impose sanctions, alter licences, or create public duties without being reformulated by competent state institutions. The main contribution lies in the concept of translational enforceability. Environmental fiqh becomes legally meaningful when its principles are selected, translated into public reasons, and embedded into valid policy instruments such as administrative standards, climate education, procurement rules, reporting duties, or licensing requirements. This model avoids both symbolic adoption and direct incorporation. It preserves constitutional legality while allowing Islamic legal reasoning to enrich climate governance through harm prevention, just transition, and intergenerational responsibility.
References
Acim, S. A., & Suharti, S. (2023). The The Concept of Fiqh al-Bī’ah in the Qur’an: A Study of the Quranic Verses on Environment in the Ulamas’ Views of Lombok. Ulumuna, 27(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.694
Carr, J. (2023). Legal geographies and ecological invisibility: The environmental myopia of evidence. Geographical Research, 61(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12572
Disemadi, H. S., & Sudirman, L. (2025). Reassessing Legal Recognition of AI: Human Dignity and the Challenge of AI as a Legal Subject in Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 54(1), 1–12.
Haris, A., Widodo, A., Tantri, I. D., & Sarah, S. (2024). Eco-Maqāṣid in Climate Change Campaigns: From an Ecolinguistics Study to the Philosophy of Islamic Law. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 219–236. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v18i2.10652
Kadir, Z. K. (2024). Psychoanalytic and Crime: Is Freud’s Theory Still Applicable in Criminological Research? Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(2), 95–110.
Kadir, Z. K. (2026a). Beyond Firearms: Mapping Global Patterns of Non-Firearm Homicide in Comparative Criminological Perspective. Punggawa Global Research: Jurnal Multidisiplin, 1(2), 1–10.
Kadir, Z. K. (2026b). Siri’Killing dalam Masyarakat Bugis-Makassar: Konstruksi, Pola Pembunuhan, dan Respons Hukum Pidana. MUTIARA: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 4(2), 158–172.
Klinkenborg, H., & Fuchs, D. (2022). Religion: A resource in european climate politics? An examination of faith-based contributions to the climate policy discourse in the EU. Zeitschrift Für Religion, Gesellschaft Und Politik, 6(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-021-00082-0
Melzatia, S. (2025). Digitalisation of Islamic Enocomy and Maqasid Sharia for National Resilience. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 31(2), 145–164.
Milhorance, C., Howland, F., Sabourin, E., & Le Coq, J.-F. (2022). Tackling the implementation gap of climate adaptation strategies: understanding policy translation in Brazil and Colombia. Climate Policy, 22(9–10), 1113–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2085650
Mufid, Moh. (2024). Reasoning Ecological Fatwas: The Progressive Response of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) to the Phenomenon of Climate Change in Indonesia. Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum, 20(02), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v20i02.4824
Munir, M. (2025). Maqasid al-Shariah as a basis for Reforming Islamic Criminal Law in Economic cases. International Journal of Law, 9(2), 117–130.
Mustafid, F., Nasution, K., & Sodiqin, A. (2024). Positivization of the Council of Indonesian Ulema’s Halal Fatwa: Policy and Position in Indonesian Legislation. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 23(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v23i1.10859
Prasad, M. (2022). Hidden benefits and dangers of carbon tax. PLOS Climate, 1(7), e0000052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000052
Shaleh, A., & Islam, Md. S. (2024). Averting the Existential Threat of the Planet: Islamic Environmental Ethics to Address the Contemporary Environmental Crisis. Intellectual Discourse, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v32i1.1937
Shuhufi, M., Fatmawati, F., Qadaruddin, M., B, J., Muhammad Yunus, M., & M.Nur, N. (2022). Islamic Law and Social Media: Analyzing the Fatwa of Indonesian Ulama Council Regarding Interaction on Digital Platforms. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 6(2), 823. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.15011
Siregar, S., Fatah, L., Imansyah, M. H., & Sunardi, S. (2025). Indonesia’s Carbon Tax: To What Extent is it Effective in Achieving the Goals? Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v10i2.1140
Sodiqin, A. (2021). Science-based Ijtihad: religious and scientific dialectic on fatwas regarding congregational worships amid the covid-19 pandemic. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 21(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i1.79-98
Susana, L. M., Tripalupi, R. I., Kholil, S., Efendi, N., & Sakinah, G. (2025). Reconstructing Islamic Legal Norms in Environmental Governance: A Maqasid-Based Legal Critique of Indonesia’s Resource Policies. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(2), 650–670. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.13038
Testriono, & Billahi, S. (2025). Revisiting Religious Environmentalism in Indonesia: Navigating Ethics, Politics, and Policy. Studia Islamika, 32(3), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v32i3.46674
Usman, U., Najemi, A., M, M., & M, M. (2022). Penyelesaian Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Secara Adat Perspektif Retorative Justice. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 6(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v6i2.20968
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Fauzi F Bachrong (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









