Clientelism and the Meaning of Free Choice in Indonesian Elections
Main Article Content
Abstract
Free electoral choice is constitutionally protected in Indonesia, but clientelism complicates the legal meaning of that protection. This article examined how election law should distinguish unlawful inducement from broader clientelistic relations without treating every social influence as coercion. It used normative legal research through constitutional, statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, reading Article 22E and popular sovereignty together with Law No. 7 of 2017, Article 25 of the ICCPR, General Comment No. 25, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The analysis found that ballot secrecy protected the act of voting, while free choice also required independent formation of electoral will. Direct inducement could be prohibited without proof of how the recipient voted. Use of public authority required evidence that a lawful resource had been converted into partisan advantage in a legally significant manner. Challenges to election results required a separate assessment of the seriousness and electoral consequence of the conduct. Social-science evidence clarified mechanisms of pressure, but legal consequences depended on the type of electoral wrong and the proof appropriate to it.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aidt, T. S., Asatryan, Z., Badalyan, L., & Heinemann, F. (2020). Vote buying or (political) business (cycles) as usual? Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00820
Agustino, L., & Hikmawan, M. D. (2026). How powerful are village heads? Clientelism in the reform era of Indonesia’s democracy. Frontiers in Political Science, 8, 1747452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1747452
Aryanda, D. F. (2026). Money politics and electoral clientelism in the 2024 legislative election: A case study in Malang City. Journal of Politics and Policy, 8(1), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jppol.2026.8.1.2
Aspinall, E., & Hicken, A. (2020). Guns for hire and enduring machines: Clientelism beyond parties in Indonesia and the Philippines. Democratization, 27(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1590816
Bacchus, E. B., & Boulding, C. (2022). Corruption perceptions: Confidence in elections and evaluations of clientelism. Governance, 35(2), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12598
Bauhr, M., & Charron, N. (2025). Vote buying, turnout and trust: Democratic consequences of electoral clientelism in the Polish 2023 election. Democratization, 32(8), 2048–2070. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2025.2485365
Berenschot, W., & Aspinall, E. (2020). How clientelism varies: Comparing patronage democracies. Democratization, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1645129
Berenschot, W., Capri, W., & Dhian, D. (2021). A quiet revolution? Village head elections and the democratization of rural Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 53(1), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1871852
Carlin, R. E., & Moseley, M. W. (2022). When clientelism backfires: Vote buying, democratic attitudes, and electoral retaliation in Latin America. Political Research Quarterly, 75(3), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211020126
Cohen, M. J., Noh, E. E., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2025). Vote buying, norms, context, and trust in elections. Comparative Political Studies, 58(4), 647–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241252099
Djuyandi, Y., Nugraha, K. P., Sugiharto, A., Jamri, M. H., & Ridzuan, A. R. (2025). Normalizing the illegal: Public perceptions of vote-buying in West Bandung Regency and its democratic consequences. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1630335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1630335
Fossati, D., Aspinall, E., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case. Electoral Studies, 63, 102111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102111
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., de Jonge, C. K., Meléndez, C., Nickerson, D., & Osorio, J. (2020). Carrots and sticks: Experimental evidence of vote-buying and voter intimidation in Guatemala. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319884998
Guerra, A., & Justesen, M. K. (2022). Vote buying and redistribution. Public Choice, 193, 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-022-00999-x
Gusniar, A., Maryanah, T., & Kurniawan, R. C. (2026). Strategies for preventing vote buying and enforcing village apparatus neutrality in the 2024 elections. Journal of Social Politics and Governance, 8(1), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.24076/bqh1vw61
Halida, R., Susianto, H., Mujani, S., & Pratama, A. J. (2022). Vote-selling as unethical behavior: Effects of voter’s inhibitory self-control, decision toward vote-buying money, and candidate’s quality in Indonesia election. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(2), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5643
Harahap, A. F., Jakimow, T., Siahaan, A. Y., & Yumasdaleni. (2023). Is money an insurmountable barrier to women’s political representation in transactional democracies? Evidence from North Sumatera, Indonesia. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 11(4), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2041442
Hasan, E., Aminah, A., Haji Hamil, H. J., & Mukhrijal, M. (2023). The practice of money politics in village head elections and its effect on the participation level of beginner voters. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v10i1.15576
Hicken, A., & Nathan, N. L. (2020). Clientelism’s red herrings: Dead ends and new directions in the study of nonprogrammatic politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 23, 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032657
Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., Weiss, M. L., & Muhtadi, B. (2022). Buying brokers: Electoral handouts beyond clientelism in a weak-party state. World Politics, 74(1), 77–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000216
Kadir, Z. K. (2024a). Dari Dualisme ke Monisme: Transformasi Konsep Mens Rea dalam Kodifikasi KUHP di Negara-Negara Poskolonial. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, (Special Issue), 142–155.
Kadir, Z. K. (2024b). Menggugat Netralitas Hukum Pidana: Perdebatan Ideologis di Balik Kebijakan Kriminal di Negara-Negara Liberal. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(4), 380–400.
Kadir, Z. K. (2025). Kriminalisasi Tanpa Batas: Mengurai Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan dalam Legislasi Kodifikasi Hukum Pidana Modern. Presidensial Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(2), 1–18.
Kao, K. (2023). Electoral institutions and identity-based clientelism in Jordan. Political Research Quarterly, 76(3), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221128752
Lundstedt, M., & Edgell, A. B. (2022). Electoral management and vote-buying. Electoral Studies, 79, 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102521
Noor, M., Hidayaturrahman, M., & Sugiantiningsih, A. A. P. (2025). Political clientelism in presidential elections: Voting behaviour and social assistance. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 29(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.94625
Pahlevi, M. E. T., Widodo, B. E. C., Kalpiando, R., Abhipraya, F. A., & Amrurobbi, A. A. (2020). The impact of anti-money politic village movement toward simultaneous election in 2019. Journal of Local Government Issues, 3(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v3i2.12962
Prasetyo, D. W., Hidayat, E., Marta, R. F., Kurniawati, L. S. M. W., & Chinmi, M. (2020). Patron-client relationship between village heads and their residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 36(2), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v36i2.6845
Putri, M. I. D., Arifani, N., Ratnasari, D., Auliavia, M. V., & Nuriyah, S. (2020). Politik dan tradisi: Politik uang dalam pemilihan kepala desa. Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.36451/j.isip.v17i2.46
Risky, S., Al-Fatih, S., & Azizah, M. (2023). Political configuration of electoral system law in Indonesia from state administration perspective. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 6(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7940
Romadhan, A. A., & Sihidi, I. T. (2023). Comparative study of money politics in Batu City and Sampang Regency in village head elections. Journal of Local Government Issues, 6(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v6i1.24527
Still, C., & Dusi, S. (2020). Vote buying and ‘money-politics’ in village elections in South India. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 58(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2020.1700021
Widiastuti, R. (2026). The dynamics of the Constitutional Court’s authority in adjudicating presidential election disputes in 2024. Jurnal Konstitusi, 23(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2315