Recorded Homicide as Lethal Violence and Subnational Spending Priorities in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Zul Khaidir Kadir

Abstract

This study examined whether police-recorded homicide was associated with realized provincial spending priorities in Indonesia. A cross-sectional ecological design used secondary official data for 2018. Homicide events reported by Statistics Indonesia were aligned with provincial jurisdictions and converted to rates per 100,000 population. Provincial expenditure shares for public order and security, health, and social protection were drawn from the Directorate General of Fiscal Balance. Descriptive statistics and ordinary least squares models with robust standard errors were estimated with population and gross regional domestic product per capita as basic adjustment variables. Recorded homicide varied substantially across the 31 aligned jurisdictions. Higher homicide was not associated with consistently larger expenditure shares. The public order estimate was negative and uncertain, the health estimate was also negative, and the social protection estimate was close to zero. The findings suggested that recorded homicide did not map directly onto provincial spending composition, partly because policing authority and provincial fiscal responsibility were institutionally separated.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Recorded Homicide as Lethal Violence and Subnational Spending Priorities in Indonesia. (2026). RATIONA: Journal of Public Affairs, Government, and Society, 1(1), 1-11. https://punggawajournal.com/rationa/article/view/187

References

Baller, R. D., Anselin, L., Messner, S. F., Deane, G., & Hawkins, D. F. (2001). Structural covariates of U.S. county homicide rates: Incorporating spatial effects. Criminology, 39(3), 561-590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00933.x

Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002320951037

Besley, T., & Coate, S. (2003). Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: A political economy approach. Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2611-2637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00141-X

BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2019). Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2019. BPS-Statistics Indonesia.

BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2020). Crime Statistics 2020 [Statistik Kriminal 2020]. BPS-Statistics Indonesia.

BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2023). Gross Regional Domestic Product of Provinces in Indonesia by Industry 2018-2022. BPS-Statistics Indonesia.

Breunig, C., & Koski, C. (2006). Punctuated equilibria and budgets in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 363-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00177.x

Directorate General of Fiscal Balance (DJPK), Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Realized local government expenditure of 34 provinces in Indonesia by function, 2015-2019 [Realisasi Belanja Pemerintah Daerah 34 Provinsi di Indonesia Berdasarkan Fungsi Tahun 2015-2019].

Faguet, J.-P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3-4), 867-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00185-8

Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loayza, N. (2002). Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 45(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1086/338347

Fitrani, F., Hofman, B., & Kaiser, K. (2005). Unity in diversity? The creation of new local governments in a decentralising Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910500072690

González Alegre, J. (2010). Decentralization and the composition of public expenditure in Spain. Regional Studies, 44(8), 1067-1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903365151

Gottlieb, A., DiMonte, C., Bocanegra, K., Hong, Y. S., & Peck-Block, A. R. (2025). Local government spending tradeoffs in the Great Lakes Region: Criminal legal spending, community investments, and violent death. Social Science & Medicine, 382, 118280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118280

Hazra, D., & Aranzazu, J. (2022). Crime, correction, education and welfare in the U.S. – What role does the government play? Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(2), 474-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.03.007

Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). A model of choice for public policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 325-351. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui018

Jones, B. D., Sulkin, T., & Larsen, H. A. (2003). Policy punctuations in American political institutions. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000583

Kadir, Z. K. (2025). Fear and control: Rethinking criminal policy through the lens of moral panic. International Journal of Law Analytics, 3(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijla.v3i2.13

Kadir, Z. K. (2026a). Better forensics, fewer solved murders? Explaining the homicide clearance paradox. Punggawa Social Inquiry: Journal of Crime, Culture, and Social Dynamics, 1(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.67707/psi.v1i2.99

Kadir, Z. K. (2026b). Konsentrasi pembunuhan pada lokasi mikro: Analisis kriminologi komparatif atas risiko kematian di berbagai kawasan dunia. Media Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 372-383. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20604599

Kadir, Z. K. (2026c). Mapping recorded homicide in Indonesia: An ecological criminological analysis using BPS data. Punggawa Law Review, 1(2), 9-18.

Kadir, Z. K. (2026d). Meninjau kembali konsep penularan pembunuhan (homicide contagion): Membedakan transmisi dan pengelompokan kekerasan mematikan. Journal of Research and Publication Innovation, 4(3), 8-15.

Kadir, Z. K. (2026e). Paradigma kebijakan kriminal dalam KUHP nasional Indonesia. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora, 4(1), 300-315. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1803

Kadir, Z. K. (2026f). Preventing murder without expanding punishment: Rethinking homicide policy beyond deterrence. Punggawa Law Review, 1(3), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.67707/plr.v1i3.40

Kadir, Z. K. (2026g). The social anatomy of homicide: Relationships, situations, and legal categories in Indonesia. SOCILEXIA: Journal of Social Sciences and Legal Studies, 1(1), 1-10.

Kis-Katos, K., & Sjahrir, B. S. (2017). The impact of fiscal and political decentralization on local public investment in Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(2), 344-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2017.03.003

Kubrin, C. E. (2003). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Does type of homicide matter? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(2), 139-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03251124

Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space? American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 922-963. https://doi.org/10.1086/229381

Lewis, B. D. (2005). Indonesian local government spending, taxing and saving: An explanation of pre- and post-decentralization fiscal outcomes. Asian Economic Journal, 19(3), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8381.2005.00214.x

Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474549

Lund, J. J., Schleimer, J. P., Reeping, P. M., & Pear, V. A. (2025). Public funds, public safety: A scoping review of government spending decisions and their impact on interpersonal violence and suicide. Injury Epidemiology, 12, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-025-00624-7

Martinez-Bravo, M. (2014). The role of local officials in new democracies: Evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review, 104(4), 1244-1287. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1244

Neumayer, E. (2003). Good policy can lower violent crime: Evidence from a cross-national panel of homicide rates, 1980-97. Journal of Peace Research, 40(6), 619-640. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433030406001

Nivette, A. E. (2011). Cross-national predictors of crime: A meta-analysis. Homicide Studies, 15(2), 103-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767911406397

Nivette, A. E., & Eisner, M. (2013). Do legitimate polities have fewer homicides? A cross-national analysis. Homicide Studies, 17(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767912452131

Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1120

Ouimet, M. (2012). A world of homicides: The effect of economic development, income inequality, and excess infant mortality on the homicide rate for 165 countries in 2010. Homicide Studies, 16(3), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767912442500

Pare, P.-P., & Felson, R. (2014). Income inequality, poverty and crime across nations. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 434-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12083

Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41(3), 611-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00999.x

Pridemore, W. A. (2008). A methodological addition to the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide: A first test of the poverty-homicide thesis. Criminology, 46(1), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00106.x

Pridemore, W. A. (2011). Poverty matters: A reassessment of the inequality-homicide relationship in cross-national studies. British Journal of Criminology, 51(5), 739-772. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azr019

Pridemore, W. A., & Rogers, M. L. (2026). Market orientation and national homicide rates. Criminology, 64(1), 88-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.70023

Ramdayani, S. S., Kharisma, B., & Wibowo, K. (2019). Local Government Spending on Social Protection, Security Order, and Crime. Jurnal Economia, 15(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v15i2.26828

Rennó Santos, M., Testa, A., & Weiss, D. B. (2018). Where poverty matters: Examining the cross-national relationship between economic deprivation and homicide. British Journal of Criminology, 58(2), 372-393. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azx013

Rodrigues Gomes, C. (2018). Crime and Government Expenditure in Brazil: Estimating the Impact of Government Security Spending on Homicide Rates. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001365

Rogers, M. L., & Pridemore, W. A. (2013). The effect of poverty and social protection on national homicide rates: Direct and moderating effects. Social Science Research, 42(3), 584-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.005

Rogers, M. L., & Pridemore, W. A. (2017). How does social protection influence cross-national homicide rates in OECD nations? The Sociological Quarterly, 58(4), 576-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1367265

Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38(4), 1021-1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb01413.x

Shi, L., Lu, Y., & Pickett, J. T. (2020). The public salience of crime, 1960–2014: Age–period–cohort and time–series analyses. Criminology, 58(3), 568-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12248

Sjahrir, B. S., Kis-Katos, K., & Schulze, G. G. (2013). Political budget cycles in Indonesia at the district level. Economics Letters, 120(2), 342-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.05.007