Bounded Authority, Executive Discretion and Institutional Constraint under Conditions of Necessity
Main Article Content
Abstract
Exceptional authority was often framed as a choice between executive capacity and institutional restraint. This study examined a narrower design problem, namely whether authority enlarged by necessity remained open to later institutional reconsideration. A comparative qualitative document analysis was conducted across Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Türkiye using constitutional provisions, emergency legislation, official institutional materials, and peer-reviewed research. The comparison found substantial variation in the formal points at which emergency authority could be reconsidered. Pakistan and Türkiye placed relatively explicit parliamentary and temporal conditions around continuation, although judicial review was restricted in important emergency domains. Malaysia combined parliamentary annulment with strong constitutional limits on judicial questioning. Indonesia gave the President a central role in declaration and stated fewer emergency-specific return requirements in the constitutional text. The findings supported bounded authority as a problem of institutional reversibility. Exceptional discretion was bounded when its continuation depended on institutions or later legal moments capable of approving, reviewing, revising, or terminating it.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Ayuni, Q., Arinanto, S., Arsil, F., & Indrati, M. F. (2022). Concept and implementation on the state of emergency in Indonesia: Outlook to strengthen checks and balances during crisis. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 9(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v9i1.83557
Azmi, Z. (2021). Government’s powers during an emergency. Journal of the Malaysian Parliament, 1, 18–37. https://doi.org/10.54313/journalmp.v1i.29
Bar-Siman-Tov, I. (2020). Covid-19 meets politics: The novel coronavirus as a novel challenge for legislatures. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8(1–2), 11–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1800250
Bjørnskov, C., & Voigt, S. (2018a). The architecture of emergency constitutions. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy012
Bjørnskov, C., & Voigt, S. (2018b). Why do governments call a state of emergency? On the determinants of using emergency constitutions. European Journal of Political Economy, 54, 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.01.002
Bjørnskov, C., & Voigt, S. (2020). When does terror induce a state of emergency? And what are the effects? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(4), 579–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719865994
Bjørnskov, C., & Voigt, S. (2026). Covid and the constitution: Unlawful states of emergency during the pandemic. European Journal of Law and Economics, 61, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-025-09855-x
Bjørnskov, C., Voigt, S., & Khesali, M. (2022). Unconstitutional states of emergency. The Journal of Legal Studies, 51(2), 455–481. https://doi.org/10.1086/718681
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Bovens, M. (2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486119
Brodkin, E. Z. (2008). Accountability in street-level organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701590587
Ferejohn, J., & Pasquino, P. (2004). The law of the exception: A typology of emergency powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(2), 210–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.2.210
Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. (2021). The bound executive: Emergency powers during the pandemic. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(5), 1498–1535. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moab059
Griglio, E. (2020). Parliamentary oversight under the Covid-19 emergency: Striving against executive dominance. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8(1–2), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1789935
Grogan, J. (2022). COVID-19, the rule of law and democracy: Analysis of legal responses to a global health crisis. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14, 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00168-8
Gross, O. (2003). Chaos and rules: Should responses to violent crises always be constitutional? Yale Law Journal, 112(5), 1011–1134. https://doi.org/10.2307/3657515
Göztepe, E. (2018). The permanency of the state of emergency in Turkey: The rise of a constituent power or only a new quality of the state? Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 28(4), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-018-0161-0
Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
Indonesia. (1945). Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Article 12.
Indonesia. (1959). Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 23 of 1959 concerning the revocation of Law No. 74 of 1957 and the establishment of a state of danger.
Kadir, Z. K. (2026a). Kebijakan Pemidanaan dalam KUHP Baru Indonesia: Antara Humanisasi dan Represivitas. Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v4i1.5855
Kadir, Z. K. (2026b). KUHP Baru Indonesia dan Prinsip Legalitas: Apakah Kepastian Hukum Masih Menjadi Fondasi? Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.58540/jih.v2i2.1252
Kadir, Z. K. (2026c). Living Law sebagai Instrumen Kebijakan Kriminal dalam KUHP Baru Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Student Research, 4(1), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v4i1.8146
Kouroutakis, A. E., & Ranchordás, S. (2016). Snoozing democracy: Sunset clauses, de-juridification, and emergencies. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 25(1), 29–77. https://doi.org/10.24926/19441992.613
Malaysia. Federal Constitution, Article 150.
Molloy, S. (2021). Approach with caution: Sunset clauses as safeguards of democracy? European Journal of Law Reform, 23(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.5553/EJLR/138723702021023002001
Najib, A. A. (2026). Constitutional control of emergency powers in Indonesia’s presidential system. Constitutional Law Society, 5(1), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.36448/jcls.v5i1.144
Pakistan. Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (official text amended through 21 November 2025), Articles 232 and 236.
Petrov, J. (2020). The COVID-19 emergency in the age of executive aggrandizement: What role for legislative and judicial checks? The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8(1–2), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1788232
Pozen, D. E., & Scheppele, K. L. (2020). Executive underreach, in pandemics and otherwise. American Journal of International Law, 114(4), 608–617. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.59
Rooney, B. (2019). Emergency powers in democracies and international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(3), 644–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002718755251
Scheuerman, W. E. (2006). Emergency powers. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.061206.074644
Schillemans, T. (2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: The horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0053-8
Schillemans, T. (2011). Does horizontal accountability work? Evaluating potential remedies for the accountability deficit of agencies. Administration & Society, 43(4), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711412931
Szente, Z. (2025). Conceptualising state of emergency, constitutional crisis management and their rule-of-law requirements. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 16(2), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.101
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
Turkut, E. (2022). Emergency powers, constitutional (self-)restraint and judicial politics: The Turkish Constitutional Court during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jus Cogens, 4, 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-022-00064-7
Türkiye. Constitution of the Republic of Türkiye, Articles 119 and 148.