The Art of Compassionate Communication: Deep Listening and Loving Speech in Thích Nhất Hạnh’s Engaged Buddhism
Main Article Content
Abstract
Research had examined compassionate communication, Buddhist communication and nonviolent rhetoric, but the reciprocal relationship between deep listening and loving speech in Thích Nhất Hạnh’s Engaged Buddhism remained less clearly articulated. This study investigated deep listening and loving speech in Thích Nhất Hạnh’s Engaged Buddhism and examined how these practices translated mindfulness and compassion into relationally grounded ethical practice. A qualitative textual and thematic analysis was conducted using selected writings by Nhất Hạnh alongside relevant scholarship on Buddhist communication, compassionate communication and Engaged Buddhism. The findings showed that mindfulness enabled awareness of suffering and reactive tendencies before they shaped communicative responses. Deep listening functioned as receptive compassion by creating space for another person’s suffering and perspective without requiring uncritical agreement. Loving speech functioned as expressive compassion by bringing understanding into truthful, non-harmful and responsible expression. Their reciprocity formed a relational communicative ethic grounded in mindfulness, compassion and interbeing. Compassionate communication was found to support conditions favourable to understanding and reconciliation while remaining distinct from structural or institutional responses to suffering. Deep listening and loving speech thus provided a communicative expression of Engaged Buddhist ethics linking contemplative cultivation with responsibility towards others.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bartels-Velthuis, A. A., van den Brink, E., Koster, F., & Hoenders, H. J. R. (2020). The Interpersonal Mindfulness Program for health care professionals: A feasibility study. Mindfulness, 11(11), 2629–2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01477-5
Bradshaw, J., Siddiqui, N., Greenfield, D., & Sharma, A. (2022). Kindness, listening, and connection: Patient and clinician key requirements for emotional support in chronic and complex care. Journal of Patient Experience, 9, Article 23743735221092627. https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735221092627
Julia, G. J., Romate, J., Allen, J. G., & Rajkumar, E. (2024). Compassionate communication: A scoping review. Frontiers in Communication, 8, Article 1294586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1294586
Moin, F. K. T., Itzchakov, G., Kasriel, E., & Weinstein, N. (2025). Deep listening training to bridge divides: Fostering attitudinal change through intimacy and self-insight. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 55(4), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13086
Nguyen, A. T., Dhammahaso, P. H., & Mahatthanadull, S. (2021). A Buddhist approach of Socially Engaged Buddhism for a skillful communication. Journal of International Buddhist Studies, 12(2), 64–75.
Nhất Hạnh, T. (1998). The heart of the Buddha’s teaching: Transforming suffering into peace, joy, and liberation. Parallax Press.
Nhất Hạnh, T. (2013). The art of communicating. HarperOne.
Nhất Hạnh, T. (2020). Interbeing: The 14 mindfulness trainings of Engaged Buddhism (4th ed.). Parallax Press.
Nhất Hạnh, T. (2024). How to listen. Parallax Press.
Öztürk, A., & Kaçan, H. (2022). Compassionate communication levels of nursing students: Predictive role of empathic skills and nursing communication course. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 58(1), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12954
Phillips-Anderson, M., & Phillips-Anderson, R. (2017). Writing a love letter to your (perceived) enemy: Thích Nhất Hạnh and the rhetoric of nonviolence. ESSACHESS: Journal for Communication Studies, 10(1), 73–90.
Somers, B. D. (2022). Mindfulness in the context of Engaged Buddhism: A case for engaged mindfulness. Religions, 13(8), Article 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13080746
Taylor, A., Bleiker, J., & Hodgson, D. (2021). Compassionate communication: Keeping patients at the heart of practice in an advancing radiographic workforce. Radiography, 27(Suppl. 1), S43–S49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.014
Ucok-Sayrak, O. (2014). Interbeing and the “ethical echo” of Levinas: Exploring communication ethics beyond willed agency. Review of Communication, 14(3–4), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2014.986515
Waistell, J., & Scherer, B. (2017). Inter-(c)are: Höpfl and Hanh’s metaphorical mediation of intercorporeal ethicality. Culture and Organization, 23(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2016.1239103